AllYouCanTech

**What’s The Difference Between IPS And VA Monitors?**

When searching for a new display, you will come across different types, each with distinct features. While OLED screens are rising in popularity, LCD monitors utilizing VA (Vertical Alignment) or IPS (In-Plane Switching) technology still provide notable benefits based on your requirements.

**VA Monitors:**
VA panels are recognized for their excellent contrast levels and rich blacks, making them perfect for enjoying movies, shows, and games where visual intricacy is important. Nevertheless, they require a central viewing position to ensure sharpness and true-to-life colors.

**IPS Monitors:**
IPS screens deliver exceptional color precision, making them ideal for photography and video production. They maintain consistent picture quality from wide angles and manage fast-moving images more effectively, which is advantageous for competitive gaming.

**Considerations:**
The choice between VA and IPS relies on individual tastes and particular use cases. VA monitors shine in delivering a cinema-like experience with improved contrast, while IPS monitors present smoother visuals and color fidelity, particularly for artistic endeavors.

**Price and Availability:**
Cost is another aspect to take into account. VA technology is more commonly utilized, resulting in a wider selection of budget-friendly options, especially for larger displays. IPS monitors, traditionally linked to high-end quality, are now more readily available but generally remain pricier due to their superior color representation.

In the end, the decision between VA and IPS monitors is influenced by your user profile and specific requirements, whether you favor contrast and immersive experiences or color accuracy and wider viewing angles.

While NASA’s main emphasis has been on the unique Artemis II mission, it has been evaluating a novel wing technology that could save airlines a significant amount of money by cutting fuel consumption by up to 10%. This operates by preserving smooth airflow, referred to as laminar flow. Testing commenced on the ground and has now taken to the skies – but not on a commercial plane. The NASA team attached a three-foot scale model of a tailored wing beneath an F-15B to assess their Crossflow Attenuated Natural Laminar Flow (CATNLF) design.

In early January 2026, the test jet maneuvered around Armstrong Flight Research Center in Edwards, California, reaching speeds of 144 mph. Due to the vertical mounting of the test wing, there was no need to construct an expensive custom aircraft. By late January 2026, the jet ascended for a 75-minute flight that attained an altitude of 34,000 feet.

The objective is to sustain laminar airflow and minimize drag on commercial flights. Drag increases when airflow abruptly shifts, leading to friction that consumes fuel. Most commercial airplanes have large, swept wings that disrupt laminar flow. NASA states that researchers have been striving for decades to enhance airflow on swept wings, which is part of the agency’s initiatives to boost the performance of aircraft wings.

How this NASA initiative could save airlines millions

Fuel constitutes the airline industry’s largest operational expense, and NASA asserts that a 10% reduction in fuel consumption achieved with the CATNLF wing design would yield millions in savings for airlines. A typical Boeing 777 flight transporting 365 passengers from New York to London consumes 14,500 gallons of fuel, thus the design would conserve approximately 1,450 gallons per flight. Based on the summer 2025 price of $2.25 per gallon for jet fuel, that translates to roughly $3,200 in savings. Considering current rates, which exceeded $5.50 a gallon in Europe in April 2026, the savings would be significantly higher.

Over the span of an average year, an aircraft making daily flights from New York to London could save $1.2 million or up to $2.6 million at the current higher fuel prices. With more than 1,300 Boeing 777s in operation worldwide, potential savings could amount to hundreds of millions of dollars. Airlines could either pass these savings on to customers or reinvest in their fleets, as air travel demand may double over the next 25 years.

The design remains in its preliminary phases, so it won’t be featured on any airline flights immediately. NASA anticipates up to 15 test flights to determine how the CATNLF design performs under various speeds, altitudes, and conditions. NASA is hopeful that, if successful, the design could eventually be incorporated into the next generation of commercial aircraft or even supersonic planes, which are making a comeback in commercial aviation in 2026.

newer 3D printers tend to be more dependable, featuring enhanced thermal management, automatic shut-off capabilities, and a physical casing to avert accidents; however, this does not render them entirely risk-free.

Numerous users operate them overnight, even for prolonged periods. Should the temperature sensors malfunction and the filament continues to heat, it may cause damage to printer components. Even more concerning, there is a potential fire hazard. It’s important to note that an inadequately maintained 3D printer can also affect print quality, often leading to a complete disaster. While these challenges can typically be addressed when someone is present, the risks escalate during unattended, overnight operations. 3D printers are ultimately machines with numerous moving parts, and some of these components reach high temperatures. It is advisable to remain nearby while a 3D printer is functioning.

If overnight printing is unavoidable, there are smarter alternatives and safety precautions to help protect against hazards. Keep in mind that these measures won’t completely eradicate the risks but can greatly reduce them.